“If that is the case they would not want to bring up Griswold in this case because it may compromise a later review of Roe”
They don’t have to; the lawyers will bring it up and the court will then address it.
Thank you but that was not my concern, not concerned of who brings it. The justices can decide to consider or not. If they rule against Obamacare with consideration to Griswold, it would be more difficult for them to overturn Roe, wouldn’t it?