Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOYAKLA

“Looking for legit answer. If a majority of States elected to secede would it be possible or preventable?
I’m not advocating secession.”

It would be possible for even one State to secede with the consent of the others or without their consent as long as they did not try to prevent it, so the answer to the question is it possible is “yes”.

As to whether or not it’s preventable, it might depend on which States and how enthusiastic the remaining States were about doing the preventing.

If the majority of the States elected to “secede”,stay together and form a new General Government, would it even be secession?

When the United States changed the form of it’s General Government from that under The Articles of Confederation to that under the Constitution, the decision was that the ratification by nine States was enough. If the other four had elected to not ratify and to go there own way would they be the ones who seceded or would the first nine?

Remember, it’s a Union of States that agreed to a General Government, actually two of them, and to a Constitution and before that the Articles of Confederation. Take away the General Government, take away the Constitution, and you still have the Union.


65 posted on 03/23/2010 10:40:01 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: KrisKrinkle
It would be possible for even one State to secede with the consent of the others or without their consent as long as they did not try to prevent it, so the answer to the question is it possible is “yes”.

Sorry, to follow you over to a different thread. Here, however, it does seem that you agree with me. It must just be some terms I used that caused the misunderstanding. Then again, I didn't spend some 30 posts clarifying our differences as I had with non-sequitur.

68 posted on 03/25/2010 3:25:37 PM PDT by Cincincinati Spiritus ( "..get used to constant change." Day 1969. "Everything has changed since 911" but a need to change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: KrisKrinkle

To clarify, my whole concern had been with the principle of the State and the sovereign people of the state having the right to secede, which has all kinds of thorns, brambles and pitfalls in which one can get lost.


69 posted on 03/25/2010 3:27:56 PM PDT by Cincincinati Spiritus ( "..get used to constant change." Day 1969. "Everything has changed since 911" but a need to change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson