Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs

Oh, you are probably right, ignore my rambling about the states having to pay.


27 posted on 03/23/2010 9:57:16 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: NEMDF; Mr. Wright

You could have separate abortion insurance policies funded by their own fees and separate pool of money, Stupak idea. The pro-choicers(pro-abortion) hated this because they know the insurance providers wouldnt offer it, and few women would sign up to fund the pool of money if they did. They argue that the need for an abortion is like the need for a specific cancer treatment, that no one anticipates till it’s too late(plus they want taxpayers paying for it). Our side argues that we dont want to pay for others abortions. Then Stupak sold out to save Obama.


35 posted on 03/23/2010 10:10:28 AM PDT by sickoflibs (( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson