I’ve explained very clearly why I think you’re wrong.
A - The average AG does not get the full story from the LMSM regarding the glaring inconsistencies and problems with Obama’s alleged COLB.
B - A judge needs to be involved because a court order would be required to gain access to Obama’s records.
C - Jurisdiction needs to be established for anyone to press charges. From what I can tell, the most direct legal violation is a FEDERAL law, not a state law. We know who controls the justice department.
D - There would be a huge political backlash from trollish Obots and politicos trying to demonize and marginalize any challenge against Barry Soetoro ... thus meaning you need not only a brave prosecutor, but a brave judge. Haven’t seen too many of either lately.
E - The governor of Hawaii doesn’t appear to want to be in the middle of any controversy (again ... political backlash). She may be a lame duck as far as being governor, but if she has other political ambitions, she probably doesn’t want to take any risks that could be used against her.
I love the way you keep making cheap personal taunts, because ultimately it exposes you as being insecure about this issue, and ultimately you know you’re wrong. Just admit it.
You have presented wonderful arguments as to why Obama will continue to win the presidential eligiblity debate. Congratulations.
Posting a fraudulent document on the internet is not a “federal” issue. Any jurisdiction where the document appeared can investigate.
If the same document or a similar document was used to verify being on a state’s ballot, that also makes the state a legitimate jurisdiction.
I’m not suggesting an “average” attorney general or district attorney get involved. It would need to be someone rather extraoridinary.
Let’s review, shall we? Here’s what civil suits have yielded in the way of results. “A definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.”
Presidential Eligibility Lawsuits against Barack Obama
Last Updated March 8, 2010.
Case Court Status
“Allen v. Soetoro” (Freedom of Information Act) Arizona District: Filed
“American Grand Jury” (Ellis) TN Middle: Dismissed
“American Grand Jury” (Laity, Campbell) NY West: Rejected
“Ankeny v. Daniels” (and McCain) Indiana State: Dismissed; Appeal Indiana Court of Appeals: Dismissal Affirmed
“Barnett v Obama, formerly Keyes v Obama et al” Fed CA Central Filed; 09-56827; Appeal by Robinson/Drake; 10-55084 Appeal filed by Taitz 9th Circuit: Pending The Court consolidated appeals 09-56827 and 10-55084 28-June-2010
“Berg v. Obama et al” Fed PA Eastern Dismissed, 08-4340 3rd Circuit Appeals Dismissed; SCOTUS Denied
Berg v. Obama Fed DC District: Dismissed; 09-5362 DC Circuit: Appealed
“Beverly v. FEC” CA Eastern District: Dismissed ; 09-15562 9th Circuit: Appeals Dismissed 09-794 SCOTUS
“Brockhausen v. Andrade” Texas State: Dismissed
“Broe v. Reed” Washington State Supreme: Dismissed
“The Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri et al v. Obama et al”; 08-3405-CV-S-AFS Fed MO West Sealed: Dismissed
“Cohen v. Obama” DC District Federal Court: Dismissed
“Connerat v. Browning” Florida state: Dismissed
“Connerat v. Obama” FL Small Claims: Dismissed
“Cook v. Good et al” GA Middle Dismissed; 09-14698C 11th Circuit: Dismissed
“Cook v. Simtech” FL Middle: Dismissed
“Craig v. US”: CIV-09-0343-F OK West Judgment in favor of defendant: 09-6082 10 Circuit USCA Dismissal Affirmed: 08-10817 SCOTUS Writ Denied 29-Sep-2009
“Dawson v. Obama” California Eastern District: Dismissed
“Donofrio v Wells” NJ State: Dismissed: NJ Supreme Court: Denied: SCOTUS: Denied
“Ealey v. Obama” TX Houston Dismissed
“Essek v. Obama” KY Eastern Dismissed
“Gopalan v Obama II et. al” CA Southern: Dismissed
“Greenberg v. Brunner”: Ohio State Court Wood County: Dismissed
“Hamblin v Obama/McCain” Arizona District: Dismissed 09-17014 9th Circuit
Dismissed
“Herbert v. Obama et al” Fed FL Middle: Dismissed; 09-6777 SCOTUS: Dismissed
“Hollister v. Soetoro” Fed DC: Dismissed 09-5161 DC: Appealed
“Hunter v. Obama” TX Northern: Dismissed
“Judy v. McCain” Federal Court Nevada District: Dismissed
“Kerchner et al v. Obama et al” 1:09-cv-00253-JBS-JS Fed NJ Dismissed
09-4209 3rd Circuit: Pending
“Keyes v. Bowen” Superior Court of CA: Dismissed
“Keyes v. Lingle:” Dismissed: Reconsideration Denied
“Lightfoot v. Bowen” SCOTUS: Denied
“Marquis v. Reed” WA state: Dismissed
“Martin v Lingle” HI State: Dismissed; 29643 HI State Appeal: Dismissed
“Morrow v. Barak Humane Obama” Fed FL Miami: Dismissed
“Neal v. Brunner” Ohio State: Dismissed
“Neely v. Obama” MI Eastern: Dismissed
“Patriot Heart’s Network v Soetoro” Federal Court DC: Dismissed
“Rhodes v. Gates” TX West: Denied
“Rhodes v. MacDonald” GA Middle: Denied
“Roy v. Obama” Fed HI: Dismissed
“Schneller v. Cortes” PA Supreme Court: Denied; US Supreme Court: Dismissed
“Spuck v. Secretary of State” Ohio state: Dismissed
“Stamper v. US” Federal Court Ohio Northern District: Dismissed
“Strunk v. Patterson et al” NY State: Dismissed
“Strunk v. NY State Board of Elections” NY Eastern: Dismissed
“Strunk v U.S. Department of State” 1:2008cv02234 FOIA Fed District of Columbia Filed, Discovery staid; 09-5322 DC Circuit: Appealed
“Sullivan v. Marshall” NY State: Dismissed
“Super American Grand Jury” Federal DC District Court: Dismissed
“Taitz v Obama” Federal DC District Court: Filed
“Thomas v. Hosemann” Fed Dist Hawaii: Dismissed
“Terry v. Handel” GA state: Denied
“Welch v. Mukasey et al” NY Northern District: Dismissed
“Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz” CT State: Dismissed: 08A-469 SCOTUS: Denied