Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
The problem with George Bush, both of them, is that neither of them was Ronald Reagan.

When Fromm says that by slithering into bed with Obama and the Democrats we could have negotiated a less odious healthcare reform, he is saying that cutting and trimming-or triangulating if you prefer-should be your guiding principle. Read the polls and cut a deal.

Ronald Reagan was not ignorant of the polls and he was quite capable of cutting a deal but he had the vision thing. He had three fundamental values in mind to him constituted good sound conservative governance: low taxes, robust defense, small government. These were not preferred options from a Chinese menu of political plays to be selected on reading Gallup. These are compelling goals to be striven after by determined people decade after decade as ardently as the Democrats have sought health care for a century.

The country knew where Reagan was taking the country. The Bushes were left with offering up a "prudent" approach to government, a middle way, a sanitized occupation in the Oval Office, a little of bigger government and a little of smaller government. George W. Bush had a shining vision which was to keep the country safe from terrorism and prevail in the war in Iraq. He told the country that the Republicans offered more prudent governance otherwise but he offered up a hodgepodge of conflicting programatic nostrums.

Then along came the bungle in Iraq which lasted years and along came Katrina which was a metaphor for Iraq and the ineptitude of the administration. No one cares passionately about prudence. People care about a conservative model of government. Betray that model and people who are patriotic conservatives cease to care.

The solution, Mr. Frum, is to cease triangulating off every burp and belch like a Pac-Man figure and start leading America Back into the Morning. It's the "vision thing," stupid.


34 posted on 03/22/2010 2:08:35 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford
I think the problem is that liberalism is irresistibly strong and powerful and that we can not win fighting against it in the media and the political world. Since the rise of alternative media more than twenty years ago, things have just gotten worse and worse regardless of who is in charge. Not one tiny program has been cut in any way except by Bill Clinton's Welfare Reform. Compromising with liberalism, will only make things worse.

Days like these are the reason the founders set up a system where this type of Government intervention was not possible. That has been corrupted and we no longer have a Representative republic, but a democracy. (Sad to say Ben Franklin, despite your warning, we were unable to keep our Republic.)There are bastions of dependency and perversion where democrats are safe until the end of time, but less and less reliable bastions of liberty. Even the safe Republican districts are heavily dependent on Social Security and Medicare, so they are only only reliable as long as the gravy flows, otherwise they will all turn Democrat overnight if Republicans came out for real Liberty and curtailing the role of the Feds in any meaningful way.

IMHO, it's over folks. "Tax cuts" aren't going to cut it this time and people are not willing to give up their benefits, real or perceived. The ONLY opportunity we will have is the coming Bankruptcy, but the Democrats and the media will be there to shepard in communism at that time, so we may not have a prayer.

50 posted on 03/22/2010 2:35:11 AM PDT by BRK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson