Posted on 03/21/2010 2:31:25 PM PDT by pabianice
Per Fox legal analyst -- Obozo's executive order to get Stupak's vote unlawful; anything added to this vote changes the Senate bill and thus invalidates today's House vote.
No - but if a section is added to the bill being voted on specifying that an EO will be issued - then you change the language of the bill. And then it MUST go back to the Senate for re-vote.
Don't know if this is the case ...
I don’t know how Democrat new anchors can live the lie of talking conservative and voting liberal. They make me sick.
Correct. The exec order is not part of the bill. It is completly free standing and could have been issued whether there was a healthcare bill or not. Some of these legal experts on tv went to the same mailorder law school as Orly Taitz!
1. Shoulda
2. Woulda
3. Coulda
1. Obama’s abortion
2. Obama illegal
3. Obama nobody
>> That’s just a technicality. <<
Absolutely. The Big Ø has told us that he and the American people don’t care about the law, which he calls “process.”
In other words the ends justify the means, and anything Big Ø and the Dhimmis do is legal so long as it contributes to the socialist goal of “redistributive justice.”
And the point is??????? Obama is the Manchurian Candidate who is hell-bent on destroying this country institution by institution. One executive order’s illegality ain’t gonna stop him.
>> Actually he only needs to persuade Kennedy, Thomas, Scalia etc <<
No, he only needs to persuade Kennedy. That’s because Alito, Thomas and Scalia will be board from the gitgo. No persuasion needed.
I recall that he’s done the same thing with the 2nd Amendment.
FOX is reporting that Hussein Obama will only sign the EO
upon passage of the bill in the U.S. House. That means, once the bill is signed Obama can put that EO on the back burner and eventually let it rot. Wonder what Stupek will say then?
Dick Morris said all along that we can’t trust Stupid....er supak.
The point is that the Annoited One has told the public in no uncertain terms that he doesn't care about process.
But "process" is just another term for the law.
In other words, the Big Ø is no longer making a serious effort to hide his disdain for the law. FReepers have known all along that he was a post-modern Marxist/Alinsyite. But now that truth is on open display to a wider world. To you, it may not be a big deal. To me, it is.
Dick Morris said all along that we can’t trust Stupid....er supak.
________________
So did I.
Supreme court doesn’t like stepping on toes. This will be passed and deemed legal. America has joined the rest of the “civilized world” in the health care debacle and one world government doesn’t seem like such a stretch anymore
________________
You may be right. The Supreme Court may not say a word. Maybe the NEXT word that needs to be heard is in November. Maybe the NEXT word may have to be spoken sooner — thru civil disobedience. refusing to comply with the healthcare mandates, etc... Guess we’ll see where the battle finds up before we know how we must fight it.
Surrender is not an option — not for me.
Betsey McCaughey mentioned this on Steve Malzberg’ show.
There are already hospitals gearing up abroad to take American patients on a fee for service basis.
That is what I get for typing while angry
Which legal expert?
I think the lights are burning at Landmark Legal and AG offices all OVER this nation...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.