To: at bay
Actually, I don’t see anything sinister with this letter. It is just a mention of differences between Canadian and U.S. freedom of expression laws. There are a lot more important issues at hand than this...
39 posted on
03/21/2010 3:41:14 PM PDT by
voicereason
(I Don't Need SEX...I Get Screwed By Democrats Everyday!!!)
To: voicereason
Actually, I don’t see anything sinister with this letter. It is just a mention of differences between Canadian and U.S. freedom of expression laws. Yeah, but it's a 'mention' like "Nice little place you got here...."
50 posted on
03/21/2010 4:24:17 PM PDT by
Grut
To: voicereason
Actually, I don’t see anything sinister with this letter. Then you should change your nic. Who else gets this type of letter? YOu don't think this is a direct and personal threat?
93 posted on
03/22/2010 9:36:17 AM PDT by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: voicereason
“Actually, I don’t see anything sinister with this letter. It is just a mention of differences between Canadian and U.S. freedom of expression laws.”
If this letter was sent to every foreign visitor/speaker, you would have a point.
But it is not.
It was sent specifically to Ann and for the express purpose to stifle her speech.
94 posted on
03/22/2010 9:49:11 AM PDT by
Hulka
To: voicereason
Actually, I don’t see anything sinister with this letter. It is just a mention of differences between Canadian and U.S. freedom of expression laws. There are a lot more important issues at hand than this... Then...clue up.
106 posted on
03/24/2010 5:56:18 AM PDT by
gogeo
("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson