Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FrankR
you should defend my right to speak my opinion on the subject

I certainly agree that you have an unalienable right to an opinion and to express it at any time or by any means at your disposal. Only a statist like, say, John McCain or Van Jones would disagree.

But you are not entitled to your own facts. Progressives used the exact argument you advance to obtain passage of Amendment XVIII in 1919. Alcohol-related crime increased with its prohibition.

Lots of people have advanced arguments about regulating fatty foods, transfats, and soft drinks due to adverse health effects. You can pretty safely bet that national dietary regulation will appear in the next few years. (But I am sure you wouldn't because some people have gambling problems.) The rationale is the same as yours: some people can't help themselves, so they need a nanny government.

WRT religion, there are a lot of people in high places who think that all, or at least some, religions are destructive to social order and individual mental health. There are innumerable examples in history. Nero banned Christianity, Pope Leo X excommunicated Luther, later Popes launched the Inquisitions, Calvin burned Michael Servitus at the stake, Salem had their witch trials, and the 20th century was far, far worse for people of faith. In each case, the political elites believed that they were acting positively to achieve some noble objective such as maintaining social order, preserving the salvation of individual souls, or preserving the Faith and the Church. In the incomparably evil cases of the 20th century, idealists who aspired to create a new socialist man or an ubermensche severely persecuted adherents of particular faiths. The Hitlers and Lenins of the world strongly believed Judaism and Christianity to be subversive of their ideas on social order and ridiculous, superstitious impediments to individual potential. To them the argument against allowing the continued existence of these faiths was just as persuasive as your argument against marijuana.

Psst ... I really don't care if you're a religious-right conservative, either. We probably agree on a lot of the important stuff. BTW, it was the Progressive Party that advocated Prohibition. I am way farther from the progressives than you, my friend.

82 posted on 03/21/2010 2:37:56 PM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Skepolitic
"I am way farther from the progressives than you, my friend. "

You are not entitled to YOUR own "facts" either, my friend.

Trying to make your case by implying that I lean progressive is a losing battle. The only thing you know about me is that I am NOT for illegal drugs and prostitution; but that seems to you that I'm probably tinkling in your backyard, so you're understandably upset...no one wants their lifestyles challenged.

Most of the arguments about fatty foods and soft drinks have been about getting more taxes out of people, just like the cigarette debacle.

Your post seemed articulate enough that you should not even consider equating food and soft drinks to illegal drugs. I've seen what drugs can do to families and individuals; they wreck lives and break up families. Never seen a 7-up send anyone to jail, or a Twinkie cause an overdose.

As far as your views on religion go...you've been watching Glenn Beck too much.

But, I know the me-me-me generation usually only worries about themselves, they don't care if drugs are legalized so long as it doesn't touch them or affect their own supply. Sounds like you're one of those selfish people who wants to live on "Fantasy Island" with all his toys and not be bothered by anyone.

So I'm closing the debate by surrendering to you and your right to smoke pot and wallow in your self-interests; quoting the history of the church will not stop some 12-year-old from overdosing on some illegal drugs or cause a 30-year-old with brain damage from drugs to waste away in an alley somewhere.

Your "F***'em, let'm die" attitude will sustain you through many episodes of shallow reality shows and rounds of golf...so, have a good life, and I hope your kids avoid the reality you are deeming they have a right to wallow in. Lots of times the me-me-ers don't have kids because they might have to stop being kids themselves...and utopia would disappear in a puff of marijuana smoke.
92 posted on 03/22/2010 7:23:33 AM PDT by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson