Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hoyer: Not at 216 yet
Politico ^

Posted on 03/21/2010 7:05:17 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Hoyer: Not at 216 yet

Countering some of the "we've got it" optimism of several colleagues, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer seems to be saying that Democrats do not yet have the 216 votes they need to pass health care reform.

"We’re going to get those 216 votes because we believe that they understand that Americans want health care reform by an overwhelming majority," Hoyer said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

When host David Gregory asked Hoyer if he has the votes now, the Maryland Democrat said: "I think we’re going to have 216 when the roll is called, yes."

Gregory: "But not yet? You're not nailed down, a few behind?"

Hoyer: "There are still members looking at it, trying to make up their minds, we think 216 plus votes when we call the roll.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: hippyhater
I just got an e-mail notification from CNN that according to blah blah the demorons now have the 216 votes

Our local radio station reported via Fox News that they had 216 as well and that it was going to pass by 1 vote.
21 posted on 03/21/2010 7:20:28 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

People love their insipid TV reality shows and meaningless ball games. Serfdom and control come through the TV. Changing channels and turning it off does not fix it. Cancelling service enmasse is the only way. People will chose serfdom.


22 posted on 03/21/2010 7:20:48 AM PDT by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
And God spoke.

Does anyone have a similar pic of a lightening bolt hitting the Capital building?


23 posted on 03/21/2010 7:20:55 AM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“We’re going to get those 216 votes because we believe that they understand that Americans want health care reform by an overwhelming majority,” Hoyer said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

These people are DELUSIONAL!


24 posted on 03/21/2010 7:21:00 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It’s all a part of the dog and pony Communist show.


25 posted on 03/21/2010 7:21:14 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

From the progressive site Fire Dog Lake: Last Updated: 11:14 pm ET, 3/20/09

Favor 204
Lean Favor 0

Oppose 209
Lean Oppose 10

Undecided 8

http://firedoglake.com/


26 posted on 03/21/2010 7:21:32 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

“They are lying. Stupak is gonna cave.”

Yep


27 posted on 03/21/2010 7:21:36 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

They are lying.


That is my take. They want to bring the drama to a head during the vote so it can appear like a truely “magical” moment. They would not have let it go this far if they thought there was any possibility of losing.


28 posted on 03/21/2010 7:23:43 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Code Red

29 posted on 03/21/2010 7:23:57 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Thank you for your contribution. Your comment has been submitted for review.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: halo66

“That’s what Geraldine Ferraro (sp?) said on Fox...Pelosi would not call a vote unless she knew 100% that she had the votes.”

Which is exactly why Reid’s statement “I think we’re going to have 216 when the roll is called” is completely meaningless. By definition, they will have 216 votes when the roll is called, since they wouldn’t be calling it otherwise. They could be 40 votes short and his statement would be just as true. The ISSUE is whether they have 216 votes to call the roll today—a question he conveniently ducked.


30 posted on 03/21/2010 7:24:17 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009
Trying to socialize all of American medicine........

It's not about medicine. It's all about POWER AND SOCIALISM.

31 posted on 03/21/2010 7:24:32 AM PDT by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Agreed. Stupak is a dem first and foremost. He is an unprincipled pro-life person, because he is a dem first.
These people are sickening.
32 posted on 03/21/2010 7:24:35 AM PDT by svcw (Jesus comforts the uncomfortable and makes uncomfortable the comfortable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: halo66
That’s what Geraldine Ferraro (sp?) said on Fox...Pelosi would not call a vote unless she knew 100% that she had the votes.

Like the first stimulus vote? We are not dealing with a band of Mensa folks here, she is a drug addled, shaker. The woman takes a handful of pills every morning(fact). Could she have the votes? sure, and I think she was downright cocky yesterday AM, but since then, since she hung herself out there, she has to vote now. Also Ferraro said Coakley was a done deal in Mass, even when te polls showed her losing, once a loser always a loser. Fritz and T*ts.1984..DONE DEAL!

33 posted on 03/21/2010 7:24:55 AM PDT by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“It is the reason why Idaho and Virginia have passed legislation blocking federal health care from being illegally imposed on the citizens of those states by reasserting their 10th Amendment rights and 34 other states considering similar legislation! “

1) Virginia

2) Idaho

3) Arizona (me)

30 odd more to follow.


34 posted on 03/21/2010 7:25:11 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: Frantzie
Stupak will cave on the “Exec order” banning public abortion funding.

Obama will reverse the Order after it passes.

Fools all.

36 posted on 03/21/2010 7:26:08 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We have a new ballgame boys and girls...

I just watched Fox News Sunday and learned that the “deem and pass” or “slaughter rule” is dead, and the Dhimmies have agreed to an up or down vote on the Senate Bill itself, the one Peloski herself was quoted last week saying she was so glad her members did not have to vote on, because it is full of the arm-twisting deals Harry Reid had to put in to get his troops to vote for it.

I am pretty certain that means the House will also have a direct up or down vote on the “reconciliation” package of “fixes” as well, that includes all of the arm-twisting deals that Madam Shpeaker had to include for her flock.

I think this is a best-case scenario for the Taxpayers, who are still raising so much hell that you cannot place a phonecall out on Capitol Hill. John Cornyn is vowing to expose every single special deal that the House makes, and is telling the House Dhimmies to be very, very careful about what they vote to approve, because it will not pass in the Senate.

I’m not saying that we have a slam dunk by any means, but it is a new ballgame this morning kids, so I give it 60/40 odds this morning that Peloski will delay that vote rather than chance it being voted down all together. If this is killed in the House, that is the end of the ballgame for Premier Hussein and the Dhimmies this Fall. They have painted themselves into a corner on this and it serves them right that there is no safe way out.


37 posted on 03/21/2010 7:26:17 AM PDT by Bean Counter (I keeps mah feathers numbered, for just such an emergency...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Ask yourself this...who will want to be the congresscritter whose name will go down on the record as "AYE number 216?" That will take huge gonads or ovaries. Just my opinion.
38 posted on 03/21/2010 7:26:22 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
“We’re going to get those 216 votes because we believe that they understand that Americans want health care reform by an overwhelming majority,” Hoyer said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” These people are DELUSIONAL!

It probably goes without saying that Gregory didn't ask him to point a poll that supports his statement. Right?
39 posted on 03/21/2010 7:26:40 AM PDT by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: halo66

I would have agreed with this prior to the TARP vote last year that failed and sent the stock market off a cliff.


40 posted on 03/21/2010 7:27:52 AM PDT by pb929
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson