Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: what's up

Hmmm...Stupak won’t be there?

Sounds like he’s already decided against this charade

Since Stupak won’t be part of the deliberations, I feel secure in my belief that this is an attempt to peel votes off Stupak, not to actually make a deal with him. One thing that isn’t being discussed elsewhere is whether members of the Stupak group want there to be a deal. I think that Stupak genuinely wanted to get his amendment passed and vote yes for Obamacare, but seven of the nine other members of his group represent districts where a NO vote (for any reason) would be popular and politically expedient. Supporting Stupak was a great way to keep the pressure off


194 posted on 03/20/2010 6:59:02 PM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: crosslink
but seven of the nine other members of his group represent districts where a NO vote (for any reason) would be popular and politically expedient

That's encouraging.

However, I read that Stupak said that some of these members had already defected to the dark side.

It would be nice if I read wrong.

195 posted on 03/20/2010 7:04:49 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson