Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand
If the abortion language in the Senate bill (H.R. 3590) says "X", an Executive Order cannot make it say "Y". It just doesn't work that way - ask Harry Truman.

I don't know very much about Harry Truman. Did he have a problem with an executive order?

57 posted on 03/20/2010 1:04:22 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: stripes1776
"I don't know very much about Harry Truman. Did he have a problem with an executive order? "

Yes, Truman tried to nationalize all steel mills in the country with an Executive Order. For the first time in history - although, up until that point, EO's hadn't really been used in quite that way - the Supreme Court granted cert on such a challenge to Executive authority on EOs The case was Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer. The Supremes held for the plaintiff, ruling Truman's EO unconstitutional.

That set the guidelines that are in place today - Executive Orders can't undo enacted legislation, or violate the Constitution.

59 posted on 03/20/2010 1:08:45 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson