Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SE Mom

National Review - the Corner

UPDATE: Politico has Stupak as a yes, “according to senior Democratic aides.”

One source who has been close to the proceedings says one thing is certain: “there is so much confusion.”
~~~~~

“democratic aides”

I still don’t trust this


2,047 posted on 03/21/2010 10:31:19 AM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2019 | View Replies ]


To: thouworm
One source who has been close to the proceedings says one thing is certain: “there is so much confusion.”

Confusion my...er, derriere.

IOW, 'Rats are lying through their teeth to each other and the nation.

2,063 posted on 03/21/2010 10:33:45 AM PDT by mewzilla (Voteless in NY-29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2047 | View Replies ]

To: thouworm

If Stupak is still a NO, as reported by CNN, Pelosi just lost him for good. And any commitment (e.g. Brian Baird) gotten from someone based on the Supak rumor would be overturned almost for sure.

BTW, I cannot imagine that Congressman Stupak would go against the Catholic Bishops, who made their hard position known last night.


2,170 posted on 03/21/2010 10:50:24 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2047 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson