Are you capable of having a meaningful discussion? Generally creationists are lacking in that ability, but I suppose there is always a possibility that I could be wrong (falsified) : )
What would you like to know about the subject of creation?
Yes, TS is capable of having a meaningful discussion. It is you, by your own admission and in your own words, who have declared that what you have to say is not truth and is meaningless.
Quote from post 64:" That is my point. It can't be tested, therefore my 'truth' is meaningless and should be treated as such.
By your own admission, what you believe and advocate as truth is meaningless, just like the chemical processes that occur in your skull that you label as *thought* and *emotion*.
I see no reason that anyone should take you seriously since you yourself admit the blather you post on FR is the byproduct of chemical reactions that you have correctly labeled as meaningless.