[metmom]

What if Darwin's theory of evolution – or, at least, Darwin's theory of evolution as most of us learned it at school and believe we understand it – is, in crucial respects, not entirely accurate?

Such talk, naturally, is liable to drive evolutionary biologists into a rage, or, in the case of Richard Dawkins, into even more of a rage than usual. They have a point: nobody wants to provide ammunition to the proponents of creationism or "intelligent design", and it's true that few of the studies now coming to public prominence are all that revolutionary to the experts.

But, but, but,.... what about consensus? And peer review?

[little jeremiah]

Interesting. Will read it all later!

[Alamo-Girl]

LOLOL!

[valkyry1]

//what about consensus? And peer review?//

Oh those tools still have their place for the evolutionists. “Science” is just a cover with them you know.