Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MichiganConservative
Though I wouldn't use that exact term, Hannity was lucky to get on the Conservative bandwagon. He subbed for Rush a few times, then went national, if I recall. I believe "Hannity and Colmes" came into existence before, or around the same time. Talk about being in the right place at the right time...

What annoys me most about his show is that he'll spend so much time hawking who is to appear on his television show later that night, and who he will be talking to later in that very same radio program.

His gushing over Lieberman is (or was?) over the top!

Hannity also loved it when Obama "attacked" him (Hannity's words) and played those clips over and over.

Say what you want about Debbie Shussel, it looks as if she did her homework, but I would like to hear the story from Ollie North.

246 posted on 03/18/2010 2:37:17 PM PDT by Watershed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]


To: Watershed

Schlussel has made herself largely irrelevant. If only Hannity were irrelevant. I consider him to be one of the worst things about the “conservative movement” today.

I hope this turns out to be a large misunderstanding on Schlussel’s part, simply because I despise the left and their socialism more than I want to see Hannity damaged in this way. Although, if you all stopped paying attention to him and dug into some intellectual steak instead of Hannity’s bubble-gum pop type of conservatism, that would be cool.

I guess I’m a snob.


251 posted on 03/18/2010 2:41:44 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson