Posted on 03/18/2010 5:30:52 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
More F-16s Little Help To Taiwan
By Greg Grant Wednesday, March 17th, 2010 2:45 pm
Posted in Air, International
Last week, Taiwan stepped up pressure on the Obama administration to sell it new, upgraded F-16s, something this administration, like the Bush administration before it, refuses to do. The latest Taiwanese move came from its defense ministry, which released a report saying that Chinas continued modernization of its fighter fleet has shifted the cross-strait military balance decidedly in Chinas favor.
The report says Taiwans ageing fleet of some 400 locally built fighters, French made Mirage 2000s, and 146 F-16A/Bs, are outmatched by Chinas massive fighter fleet, particularly with Chinas growing numbers of Russian built Su-30s. Only Taiwans F-16A/Bs have an edge over Chinese fighter aircraft, the report says. Taiwan requested some 66 F16C aircraft from the U.S. in 2006.
Over at right-leaning think tank AEIs defense blog, Michael Mazza raises the alarm:
Are policymakers considering the implications of this? The smaller and more antiquated the Taiwan air force is, the greater the number of American pilots in harms way should the U.S. ever need to go to the islands defense. Its not clear that anybody is doing this math, as simple as it is.
Actually, RAND did the math on this one in a report last year, in typical RAND style, using sophisticated modeling to simulate a Chinese invasion of Taiwan in the 20102015 timeframe. RANDs conclusion was that the addition of a few dozen upgraded F-16s would have little to no impact on the cross-strait balance. In fact, RAND found that in the event of a Chinese attack, the air war for Taiwan could essentially be over before much of the Blue air force has even fired a shot.
Its not the Chinese air fleet that would deliver the knock out blow to Taiwanese air power. Rather, its Chinas massive arsenal of ballistic missiles that would destroy most Taiwanese aircraft in an opening salvo, even those in hardened shelters. They would also wreck Taiwanese runways before they could launch their fighters.
Adding new F-16s to Taiwans inventory does little to change the ultimate outcome. Well, more Taiwanese aircraft would make a small contribution RAND found: Taiwans air power can at least contribute to the anti-invasion defense by absorbing as much of Chinas air effort as possible in the process of being put out of action. In other words, parking more fighters on Taiwans ramps would make the Chinese deplete more of its missile magazines.
The answer to the cross-strait military balance will not come in the form of more short range tactical fighters sat on ramps within range of Chinas massive missile force. As the RAND study conclusively shows, selling Taiwan more capable F-16s does nothing to change the military balance.
This analysis is good as far as an all-out war is concerned, but what about something less than all-out war? Taiwan fighters have mixed it up with PLAAF fighters over the straits before.
It is saddening to admit that, over time, the United States is a treacherous, undependable and unfaithful ally. In the end, we will sell you out and abandon you to your enemies. We are the modern Superman, but time is our kryptonite.
But it helps our exports!
If I were Taiwan, I think I would approach North Korea for missile and nuclear technology. This would get bammy and his drooling lickspittle SOS attention. Should make for an interesting conversation: US you can’t go nuclear, ROC: we have no choice we are outmatched in fighter technology thanks to your China first policy. Reminds me of our State Dept telling other countries they can’t build apartments in their capital city. Imperialism anyone?
OK, how about a few Patriot missile or Israeli Arrow missile batteries?
Do you honestly think that China will just sit waiting for TW to make nukes?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.