Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deport
That checks out.

So Orly is wrong again. Color me unsurprised.

59 posted on 03/18/2010 11:37:29 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
So Orly is wrong again. Color me unsurprised.

Wrong is one thing. What she went on to say about Dunn is among the most offensive and disgusting things I've read lately:

In January, she had this to say about Dunn, a real estate entrepreneur and former Stanford football star:

"The only reason he was endorsed so far, is because he is an African American and Republicans want to have an African American to show diversity. He admits to having no knowledge or experience with law, elections or election law"

http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/the-hilarious-haters/repub-secretary-of-state-candi/

Damon Dunn is a graduate of Stanford University (poli-sci, iirc), a former athlete, and has a successful real estate business man. If that's not successful, I don't know what is.

That Orly Taitz would choose to slam him by saying that he's "only" there because he's African American is beyond vile. He's educated and successful in his own right, but he's there because he's black? Can that possibly be more offensive?

That she would say he isn't qualified because he isn't experienced with the law (i.e., a lawyer) is ludicrous.

George Washington and Ronald Reagan weren't lawyers, along with 17 other presidents, and they all seemed to do okay.

71 posted on 03/18/2010 3:33:58 PM PDT by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney is the answer to a question no one asked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson