One of the questions on the short form positively INFURIATES me!!! It’s the question that isn’t there: 11) Citizenship.
FrdmLvr, you are exactly right!!
I would have no problem filling out the form were it defining the count on the basis of CITIZENSHIP.
If the number of House Reps is to be apportioned based on this number then it is imperative that the number be based on LEGAL CITIZENS.
Why is there not an uproar about this aspect of the census? Have we become so complacent or so focused on other issues (like lack of freedom) that we can’t see the real issue here. Is our House Representation going to be apportioned influenced by the masses of illegals and where they are concentrated? If that is so, then our “freedom” will indeed be threatened by more than having to provide a bit of harmless info on the census form.
I am only going to give them the number of people living in the house. But I am still trying to decide how to word the statement I will attach as to why. My protest is based on the fact that this is not a valid census since it does not distinguish between citizens and non-citizens.
Am I wrong?