The whole point of this is to force a challenge to old rulings about interstate commerce, specifically the Wickard v Filburn decision, which greatly expanded the tentacles of the federal government.
The Montana law will be the one that gets the challenge to the high court first, but showing a trend among the states toward this type of law can influence the justices’ decisions on the matter.
Several justices have expressed interest in revisiting Wickard, so it isn’t inconceivable that a decision could go our way. Overturning Wickard would be a huge advancement for the cause of limited government and freedom.
Do you know the specifics of the case? This is very interesting...