Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
Excerpt:

According to Stupak, that group of twelve pro-life House Democrats — the “Stupak dozen” — has privately agreed for months to vote ‘no’ on the Senate’s health-care bill if federal funding for abortion is included in the final legislative language. Now, in the debate’s final hours, Stupak says the other eleven are coming under “enormous” political pressure from both the White House and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.). “I am a definite ‘no’ vote,” he says. “I didn’t cave. The others are having both of their arms twisted, and we’re all getting pounded by our traditional Democratic supporters, like unions.”

Stupak says he also doesn’t trust the “Slaughter solution,” a legislative maneuver being bandied about on Capitol Hill as a way to pass the Senate bill in the House without actually voting on it. “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me,” he says. “I don’t have a warm-and-fuzzy feeling about what I’m hearing.”

Stupak notes that his negotiations with House Democratic leaders in recent days have been revealing. “I really believe that the Democratic leadership is simply unwilling to change its stance,” he says. “Their position says that women, especially those without means available, should have their abortions covered.” The arguments they have made to him in recent deliberations, he adds, “are a pretty sad commentary on the state of the Democratic party.”

What are Democratic leaders saying? “If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue — come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.”

46 posted on 03/12/2010 3:24:05 PM PST by nutmeg ("We have to pass the bill first so you can find out what's in it." - Nancy Pelosi, March 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nutmeg
Uhmmm...is this a joke? Is he being sarcastic?

He can't mean this:

“If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says.

53 posted on 03/12/2010 5:08:58 PM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat veteran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the ping!


56 posted on 03/12/2010 8:47:56 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
The others are having both of their arms twisted, and we’re all getting pounded by our traditional Democratic supporters, like unions.”

And it's working if we're to believe Pelosi only needs 6 more votes. I'm getting so sick of FNC pundits telling us this week that there's a 50/50 chance; followed by there's only a 50/40 change what with the Parlimentarian ruling and now we learn she only needs 6 votes?? At this point I want it over with now, come what may.

65 posted on 03/13/2010 1:57:38 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson