Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sarah-bot

Now, I thought the Dems/Libs believed in the ‘right to privacy’....hmmmm....seems Roe v. Wade was based on an individuals supposed ‘right’ to privacy...even to the degree that a husband had no right to know if his wife was pregnant.

How do you square this fact with a mandate to purchase health insurance since if you have to buy a policy you will undoubtedly have to disclose personal health information as a consequence? Does the right to privacy (which is dubious at best anyway) only pertain to pregnant women?

It’s all a house of cards.


40 posted on 03/10/2010 8:13:36 PM PST by Ethrane ("semper consolar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Ethrane

I fully agree with you and I don’t think this health care bill will survive a constitutional challenge. The Supreme Court would have to decide between which one to uphold, either abortion or the health care bill. Even Sotomayor would have to vote against the health care bill, in order to protect her abortion ritual.


48 posted on 03/10/2010 8:23:46 PM PST by Sarah-bot (Abortion (Satanic offering))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson