To: Former Military Chick
If a point of order cannot be overcome and is not ruled improper by the Senate Parliamentarian...My understanding is that the Senate Parliamentarian's rulings are only advisory and that the presiding officer of the Senate is technically free to do what he or she pleases.
To: Labyrinthos
"My understanding is that the Senate Parliamentarian's rulings are only advisory and that the presiding officer of the Senate is technically free to do what he or she pleases."And what is the numerical limit on the number of times a "point of order" may be raised?
23 posted on
03/10/2010 2:20:27 PM PST by
LZ_Bayonet
( I AM THE TEA PARTY LEADER !)
To: Labyrinthos
...the presiding officer of the Senate is technically free to do what he or she pleases.And that would be Mr. Plugs. Game. Over.
But all in all it still has to be voted on AS IS in the House. That may not happen.
25 posted on
03/10/2010 2:21:25 PM PST by
Drill Thrawl
(Another day, another injury, another step closer. Are you prepared?)
To: Labyrinthos
the presiding officer of the Senate is technically free to do what he or she pleases. And when you say 'he or she', you are describing VP Joe Biden. LOL
28 posted on
03/10/2010 2:26:27 PM PST by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson