Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
Also, why should an e-tailer in another state be required to pay for another state’s fire/police/idiot politicians when it will derive no benefit or service from said monies as they are not in that state?
The "e-tailer" does not pay the tax. The purchaser who lives in the state pays the tax.


27 posted on 03/10/2010 8:05:10 AM PST by Peet (<- A.K.A. the Foundling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Peet
The "e-tailer" does not pay the tax. The purchaser who lives in the state pays the tax.

Right, but they would pay the tax on purchases originating outside the state, right?

Interstate sales have always been off-limits for taxation, haven't they?

Legislation such as this turns the e-tailer, or Amazon, into a tax-collection agency, and puts them under the jurisdiction of the State of Colorado, to one degree or another. See the problem?

29 posted on 03/10/2010 8:19:36 AM PST by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson