Yes, I have heard that some people will answer citing either the 4th and/or 5th amendments. That could be another way to go.
Just phrase it so that you are answering the question, ie - My answer is that I assert my 4th and 5th amendment rights regarding this question.
The technicality that they could try to get people on is that they didn’t answer the questions. IN fact you have answered the question, it’s just an answer they didn’t particularly want. And I say I did answer, you just didn’t like what my answer was. Now get off my property or I’m calling the sheriff.
I plan to answer everything the Constitution asserts. Nothing more, Nothing less.
Pulled from the net. Take it for what it’s worth...
“This Constitution and the Laws made in Pursuance thereof… shall be the supreme Law of the Land…all Judges shall be bound thereby…any Thing…to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
-Article VI, Clause 2, of the Constitution of the United States of America (1789).
“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void. Unconstitutional law bears no power to enforce, it purports to settle as if it never existed, for unconstitutionality dates from the enactment of such a law and not such time as branded in an open court of law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. No courts are bound to uphold it and no persons are bound to obey it.”
-16 Am Jur 256.
“The Fourth and Fifth Amendments were described in Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 630, as protection against all governmental invasions ….of the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life.” We recently referred [381 U.S. 479, 485] in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 656, to the Fourth
Amendment as creating a ….right to privacy, no less important than any other right carefully and particularly reserved to the people.”
-GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
Declaration To Make To Census Takers
“I hereby affirm that the provisions of Title 13 ….requiring” me to disclose my race, personal financial data, birthdate, or any other personal, private information to the Bureau of the Census, an agency of the United States government; constitutes an unreasonable, unwarranted search of my person, house, papers, and/or effects; and a governmental invasion of the sanctity of my home and the privacies of life. As such, these provisions violate the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, and are thus wholly void and I am not bound to obey them.
I have completed the only those sections of the Census form pertaining tothe Constitutionally-mandated actual numeration, as follows:
1. The actual number of people living at the address printed on the form, excluding untaxed Native Americans;
2. Age of each person in accordance with US Const. Amendment XIV, Section 2.
3. Sex of each person, in accordance with US Const. Amendment XIV, Section 2
I have thus fulfilled my obligation to the attainment of the actual enumeration of the populace of the United States.
Any fine or other sanction that is levied by any office or organization stemming from the unconstitutional provisions of Title 13 in connection with my response to this or any other Census-related questioning will be challenged in a court of law.”