Not according to some FReepers:
Mon Feb 15 15:08:11 2010 · 99 of 383OTOH, Buckey can always be counted on to show up on any birth certificate thread and poo-poo any effort to establish 0bama's actual birth circumstances. Judge his bias and words accordingly...
BuckeyeTexan to null and voidI know I’m absolutely right. That 5.7% ownership stake gets the holding company (and effectively the Saudi) a vote on News Corp shareholder issues. It doesn’t get him input into Fox News programming.
I have the second largest number of shares in an S-corp and I get to vote on shareholder issues. What I don’t get to do is tell the majority owner how to do business. I have an opinion, which, as you well know, I am happy to share even when it isn’t requested. An opinion doesn’t equate to input into corporate policy.
Say it ain’t so, nully. Tell me you don’t really believe that “Saudi-controlled” claim.
Tex
While I’m sure the entire birther crowd will disagree, I beg to differ with your statement. I don’t show up on every eligibility thread and I don’t always challenge the circumstances of Obama’s birth. Frankly, it doesn’t really matter to me where he was born. I don’t believe he’s an NBC based on his citizenship status at birth.
I believe he has a birth certificate on file in Hawaii. Beyond that, anything else I offer on the subject of his documentation is mere speculation based on logic or my own experience with government paperwork.
It wears me out that birthers jump from one possible conclusion to an impossible conclusion and then take that emotional leap of faith to presumed facts. I hate to see FR’s credibility slowly erode with the perpetuation of falsehoods and speculation.
But, with the threatened zotting of parsy, I accept JimRob’s decision. Perpetuate your theories to your hearts’ content. Label loyal freepers and conservatives trolls until you’re blue in the face. Good luck in your pursuits.
Tex