Son....
You brought this one on yourself:
Here you are telling me that THE WALL STREET JOURNAL “is a better source than Atlas for the subject at hand (I think everyone is fully aware of this matter and it doesn’t mean that the Saudi’s control News Corp)...”
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL IS OWNED BY MURDOCH!!!!!!!! (as you know).
You expect me to believe it just because it comes out of one of his OWN papers!
This proves the point to perfection. You are defending something from within itself. Do you ever leap beyond the expanses of Murdoch ‘news’?
Maybe you need to read more about the nature of Islam. What fool signs contracts with the hub of Islam? You need to answer this and nothing else. Don’t answer for me - answer for you!
Notwithstanding the FACT that our country is signing with them just about every day - the results of which we will regret.
Man this is silly. You speak of “Foxnews integrity” like you own a piece of it. It is more like Foxnews agenda. They have an agenda. If you believe differently, then you are again, OWNED. I’m sorry....I used to be a devout Fox fan myself, but no more. I grew up. I’m done here.
lol...this is no big deal.
I was only looking for a source.
Going back to the beginning of our chat...I never said that what you said was incorrect (in fact, in one of my earliest post I said you might very well be correct, but I would like to review info provided by your source--it was your insecurities that presumed otherwise).
As for defending Fox...I am very much concerned that Fox might soften its heretofore heroic stand against Obama and Islam. But I don't think Murdoch's transactions with Alwaleed for access to the Saudi market necessarily provide evidence for it. Nor do I think Alwaleeds minority ownership of Fox demands it.
OTOH, Murdoch is human and as such is subject to influence.
My point in the final analysis is that I like to look long and hard at the evidence, and for that I do appreciate your providing me with the Atlas link. Thx.