Posted on 03/08/2010 9:02:26 PM PST by SmithL
When her father got back in the truck and began to move, the girls mother realized she wasnt in the cab. Before the mother could get her husband to stop the truck, he ran over her with the rear wheels of the rig and crushed her pelvis, the documents said.
What was she doing UNDER the truck in the first place!?! Everyone with a brain knows you don't get under a truck (unless the wheels are chocked and you have the keys in your pocket).
I'm all for compassion but rewarding someone for their own stupidity is senseless.
If it hadn’t been her father would she have even been there?? Why didn’t the trucking company counter claim and name the father?
Idiots.
Personally, I'd be a lot more interested as to just why the girl was any where near where her father, the trucker, was working and if he wasn't working but at home, what was going on that the girl needed to be in the path of his truck.
I, too, would first sue the lawyers for sloppy representation (questionable at best) for not challenging the make up of the jury then not going after a lot more facts in the case.
In no way, so far as I can tell from this story, is the trucking company at fault.
Bad as it is that the girl was injured, by her own father, the the owners of the trucking company might only be faulted for hiring the guy in the first place.
Only in California as they say.
Such is the state of "justice" in America.
GIMME DA MUNNY!
I know how I "feel" when I hear that question. Most times, when I feel that way there is something I can take for it.
Speaking as a woman, I despise the feminization of America and speak out against it at every opportunity.
**But where does the insurance company get its money from?**
Fundamentally, all insurance is the process by which many contributors undertake a *shared* risk. The premium or cost to each is smaller than the loss to an individual should catastrophe strike.
Each contributor or policy holder agrees to the terms.
The system breaks down when fraud and abuse are introduced by false or excessive claims.
This is best illustrated by the Scooter Looter scams in the Medicare program and the automobile insurance scams of contrived vehicle *accidents*.
“Can the trucking company sue the driver to mitigate its own losses”
No.
You can sue anyone for anything in California. Winning is something else. Collecting is something else again.
Yes, but the driver doesn't have $24 million or anything close to it.
I was just following up on that with a supposition of my own.
That’s sort of what I was saying. Because the people who decide how much the damages should be have no personal stake in the affair, and because there is no limit to the amount they can set, and becasue they tend to side with “the little guy”, the system is being abused NOW...to the general detriment of the entire State. The population of California is - what, 30 million or so? That means everyone in the State has effectively paid this girl 80 cents or so. Which is nothing. But how many cases are there?
Semi Trucks...
The next generation of ambulances...
Just like blood in the water attracts sharks...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.