So what is your problem with what I said?
It's that your statement (that I was responding to) was not sufficient to refute the idea presented.
On the other hand, providing Palin's statement, plus stating the circumstances of travel to Juneau, versus travelling to Whitehorse, and how Skagway and Whitehorse are more connected than Skagway and Juneau (because of "transporation" and because of business connections with Whitehorse) -- goes a lot further and it "clarifies" things.
Your statement was merely something that anyone would expect if you are a supporter of Sarah Palin ... typical "knee-jerk" reaction, but no answers.
For these things, we need answers.
Give me a link to my statement that disagrees with your post #199