[GLDNGUN]

The people in Alaska put her in the position of Governor and now she is choosing a candidate who is against everything about Alaska so save your B.S. enabling storyline because if Hayworth loses to the POS you Sarahbots can take some of the balme along with Palin.

So Palin should have never been his running mate, right? And now if Hayworth loses it's who's fault? Here's a clue for you...if Hayworth loses it will be HIS fault and nobody else's. Endorsements don't win a campaign. I'll clue you in on something else. Regardless of who wins the Arizona Senate primary, if Palin runs for President, she will carry Alaska in the primary and general election. LOL

[theanchoragedailyruse]

Here is a clue, Palin won’t get the primary win in Alaska.

She burned too many bridges and that is a fact so get over yourself on what you know about Palin.

Unlike yourself who is a johnny-come-lately I have followed Palin for some time.

And yes she should have never accpeted. But when asked about who she would vote for in the primary, McCain was on her list, so this idea of being loyal to McCain because he picked her is foolish.

She hedged her bets by not making a clear choice during the Republican primary. She kept it to herself.

Nice try on the endorsemnts because some of you Sarahbots are playing coy with your real feelings on hoping McCain wins to make your point on Sarah Palin’s ability to endorse winners.

[stephenjohnbanker]

“.if Hayworth loses it will be HIS fault and nobody else’s. Endorsements don’t win a campaign.”

Then why is McCain importing “endorsements” from Boston to Alaska for an Arizona race? Do you even read what you type?

LOL!