Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/06/2010 7:34:53 PM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rabscuttle385

Can we say Garden Plot


2 posted on 03/06/2010 7:37:00 PM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamahead; Bokababe
A close reading of the bill suggests it would allow the U.S. military to detain U.S. citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. based on suspected activity.

Big Government will keep us "safe"...just like it did on September 11!

3 posted on 03/06/2010 7:37:38 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

They attacked Bush mercilessly for wanting to spy on and detain terrorists.

Now we have detainment for citizens and we have cell phone tracking, web page logging and email reading.... where are the marches and the big protests??

hhhhmmmmmm.....


4 posted on 03/06/2010 7:37:52 PM PST by GeronL (I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

We will no longer be considered Citizens, but Potential Combatants.


9 posted on 03/06/2010 7:43:13 PM PST by VicVega ( SAINTS WIN THE SUPER BOWL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

You expected something else from a communist?


10 posted on 03/06/2010 7:44:42 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
(5) such other matters as the President considers appropriate.

Why did someone claim that this bill required a close reading? It's fairly obvious that it is unconstitutional. Seems to be a specialty of McCain.

11 posted on 03/06/2010 7:45:12 PM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March; lmarie373; Abundy; missanne; Victoria Delsoul; 50mm; stockpirate; Eaker; ...
*Ping!*
12 posted on 03/06/2010 7:45:38 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

“based on suspected activity.”

I wonder if the PROGRESSIVES have got a re-education camp somewhere that’s big enough to hold the TeaPartiers?


15 posted on 03/06/2010 7:58:03 PM PST by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

*


16 posted on 03/06/2010 7:58:22 PM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

“The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”

1. Obama thinks he’s Lincoln;
2. like McCain, 0 knows that he and his henchmen from both parties are as popular as turds in the punch bowl; and,
3. the US Constitution is something to be followed only when it suits him.


18 posted on 03/06/2010 8:04:43 PM PST by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Despite the photoshopped image of Obama ripping the Constitution, note that the bill was introduced by the 2008 Republican nominee and the favorite Democrat of the Pubbies.

It should now be clear why McCain said Theodore Roosevelt would be his role model if elected President.

Bottom line: the Constitution (and its Bill of Rights) is a dead letter.

It means whatever the elites say it means, which is about 150 degrees opposite of what it originally meant. The difference between the Democrat and Republican elites is the difference between 145 degrees and 160 degrees.


19 posted on 03/06/2010 8:12:26 PM PST by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
enemy belligerent

Now comrade you know, if you go against the government, in any way that they seem to think you are a threat. You know, like grandma at the tea party, holding her hateful sign. You can be thrown into detention indefinitely.

Echo's of the good ol' USSR.

20 posted on 03/06/2010 8:14:18 PM PST by MsLady (If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Damn thing has 9 cosponsors already
22 posted on 03/06/2010 8:47:11 PM PST by BufordP (Once a Marine - always a Marine ... Until Jack Murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
First reading looks fine to me. They want to make sure an “unprivileged enemy belligerent” is not afforded constitutional protections. They seem to be setting a time limit of 48hrs for such a determination to be made. They can already hold somebody for 24hrs without a reason why, right?

Or are we just trusting the far-right publication the Atlantic to report this and basing comments on that?

24 posted on 03/06/2010 9:03:47 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Democrats and Pelosi. The party of thieves, liars and tax cheats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
How about using it for userpers and traitors in high office?
28 posted on 03/06/2010 9:18:45 PM PST by 1ofmanyfree ((No jobs, licenses,mortgages,bank accounts or amnesty for any illegal alien criminals ! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

LOC doesn’t have the text yet. It’s S-3081.

From your link to the Atlantic-
2. Criteria for designation of individuals as high value detainees-
E. Such other matters as the President considers appropriate.

Looks like a hand over of power to me.


29 posted on 03/06/2010 9:34:15 PM PST by Old Flat Toad (Pima County, home of the single vehicle accident with 40 victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Scary stuff!!!! The language is loose enough to cover ANYone they want to consider an enemy as falling under this garbage if it passes. Seeing as how the Left have already called tea partiers “domestic terrorists”, this is truly dangerous.


31 posted on 03/06/2010 9:41:05 PM PST by radu (May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Does this apply to all the “belligerents” at FR, such as yourself?
35 posted on 03/07/2010 9:13:02 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

American citizens to be “protected” under the laws of the Geneva convention, foreign combatants out of uniform given full Constitutional protections now.......something JUST doesn’t seem kosher to me. col


44 posted on 03/08/2010 7:55:59 AM PST by runninglips (Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson