Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sloth

“I’ll simply vote third-party like I did in 2008.”

Great, so we have YOU to thank for Obama.

(not that I ever liked McCain, but voting for third party got us Bill Clinton, Dem Congress and Obama — will some people never learn?)

As I said, I am hoping for a strong conservative Republican, who is also able to get the support of independents to beat Obama. Some fuzzy RINO couldn’t beat Obama.


16 posted on 03/06/2010 7:12:34 PM PST by SmartInsight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: SmartInsight

I live in a strongly red state — my vote didn’t matter. But even if it had, I still think it was more important to punish those who nominated McCain than to stop Obama.


26 posted on 03/06/2010 7:23:08 PM PST by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SmartInsight

Agreed. I still kick myself for thinking Perot could actually win and denying Bush senior my vote.


37 posted on 03/06/2010 7:42:29 PM PST by Kellis91789 (Democrat: Someone who supports killing children, but protests executing convicted murderers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SmartInsight

If McCain had won we wouldn’t be looking at Republicans gaining seats this year. He’d be driving conservatives and Independents even further away from the party the way he did in ‘06 and ‘08. I voted for Palin but don’t fault people who couldn’t vote for McCain at all. Long term we’re better off he lost. If yu want to blame anyone, blame voters who selected McCain and Obama in the primaries.

Far as this ‘12 soeculation goes some people think America will want a colorless candidate. Jump from one extreme to the other. This is the argument the guys at Powerline advance for guys like Mitch Daniels. Some think you need a charismatic candidate to combat a charismatic candidate which leaves only Palin. Then you have the old northeastern club leaning toward Romney. With Perry winning a new front is opening up. He’s establishment but managed to claim somewhat believably to be against the establishment. He has ties to insiders and represents one of the most populous states, but he also has ties with the tea parties. Barnes probably thinks they’ve stumbled on the ideal candidate that isn’t named Jeb Bush.

I have doubts. Just as Jeb’s name bars him from running Perry being from Texas so soon after Bush may not play well. Plus while I supported him over KBH or the Truther that doesn’t mean I buy entirely his conversion. He was smarter about it then Romney, Romney’s 180 to being a conservative was a joke. Perry’s been able to make the transition seem seamless.


38 posted on 03/06/2010 7:43:21 PM PST by Soul Seeker (? for anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson