As much as I love Sarah (and I'm still driving around with a Palin bumper sticker - I cut McCain's name off) - as much as I love her, and had high hopes for her to be our first woman president - it pains me to say that I share your feelings.
I'm happy that she is a great voice for the conservative way of thought, and that she can reach an audience that normally wouldn't hear it - but these are not the things she should be doing if she is planning on running in 2012. She needs to get serious and establish her credibility on very serious issues.
I wouldn't blame her if she's decided not to run & that she can do a lot of good work immersing herself in popular culture. I lost a lot of enthusiasm when she decided to endorse McCain - I will say it again - SHE OWES HIM NOTHING! I am still looking for a leader that will buck the establishment, and so far - I'm not seeing it from her.
GOD bless her, I wish her lots of success, but now I'm back where I was before - looking around for a leader to take us out of the wilderness - I see no one in sight.
She needs to get serious and establish her credibility on very serious issues.
$$$$
Like Romney is doing? How’s that working out for him!
Sarah could spend every day addressing the most serious issues affecting the world, and media coverage would still attack her.
White House “reporters” are openly saying “we” versus “the Republicans” in their “news” programs now. Sarah would not have a chance if she allowed “reporters” to “report” what she was offering in the way of “serious issues.”
Some of her accomplishments were a positive revamping of the energy policies of Alaska, and major agreements with Big Oil companies up there.
From the “news” media “reporting” on her: crickets.
Romney is unacceptable. He made socialized medicine into law in Massachusetts. An alternative to Palin, Romney, Huckabee, and Pawlenty would be Mitch Daniels, Gov. of IN.