Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry: Let Gay Men Give Blood
thebostonchannel.com ^ | March 4, 2010

Posted on 03/04/2010 12:02:42 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY

Lets pump about a quart of that gay blood into the fruitcake Kerry


41 posted on 03/04/2010 12:16:57 PM PST by hgro (Jerry Riversd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
There are plenty of events in your life or lifestyle habits that can get you excluded from giving blood.

I couldn't donate blood because I spent a semester in France in 1984. I felt bad because I'm the universal blood type, but it's better than possibly giving someone the human equivalent of mad cow disease.

42 posted on 03/04/2010 12:17:15 PM PST by proud American in Canada (my former tagline "We can, and we will prevail" doesn't fit with the usurper's goals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"Gay men should be allowed to donate blood and laws banning them from doing so are discriminatory and outdated, according to Sen. John Kerry"

Pretty brave talk from a guy who got Purple Hearts for a few scratches!!!

43 posted on 03/04/2010 12:17:42 PM PST by LADY J (Change your thoughts and you change your world. - Norman Vincent Peale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Kerry needs to read what the CDC has to say:
44 posted on 03/04/2010 12:17:53 PM PST by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

No wonder my country is going to hell in a handbasket with people like this idiot continuing to get elected...What is WRONG with you people in Mass?????????


45 posted on 03/04/2010 12:17:59 PM PST by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
""Not a single piece of scientific evidence supports the ban,”"

I'm not a doctor, but isn't the HIV infection rate for gay men still twice the rate that it is for the general population? I believe that gay men account for 1/2 of all the new HIV cases, each year. Isn't that reason enough?

46 posted on 03/04/2010 12:19:40 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

LMAO


47 posted on 03/04/2010 12:20:15 PM PST by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: henkster

And his daughters.


48 posted on 03/04/2010 12:21:22 PM PST by angcat (GOD SAVE US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Gay Men’s Blood Still Not Safe Says The FDA

The FDA said HIV tests currently in use are highly accurate, but still cannot detect the virus 100 percent of the time. The estimated HIV risk from a unit of blood is currently about one per 2 million in the United States, according to the agency.

The FDA says that as a group, men who have sex with men (MSM), carry an increased risk of HIV, hepatitis B and other infections that can be transmitted by transfusion. They point out this decision not unique to the United States and quote a European Union directive that also concurs with this policy.

“Men who have had sex with men since 1977 have an HIV prevalence (the total number of cases of a disease that are present in a population at a specific point in time) 60 times higher than the general population, 800 times higher than first time blood donors and 8000 times higher than repeat blood donors.”

A particular area of concern appears to be the “window period” following a recent infection of HIV when there is not enough of the virus in the blood to guarantee its detection.

However, the FDA says that it would only change its policy if there was sufficient scientific evidence, and new tests are not 100 per cent accurate. This follows last year’s FDA Workshop on Behavior-Based Donor Deferrals in the NAT Era, where FDA scientists and blood experts discussed the topic of MSM deferral and the evidence for and against it. (NAT stands for nucleic acid testing, which was approved by the FDA in 2001 for screening blood plasma for HIV and hepatitis C.)

There has been a strong reaction to the renewal of this policy, with many people saying that it discriminates against gay men. The FDA says that the policy is not discriminatory, their view is that MSMs present a high risk group compared to others:

“Scientific evidence has not yet been provided to FDA that shows that blood donated by MSM or a subgroup of these potential donors, is as safe as blood from currently accepted donors,” says the FDA website.

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:aiiLiPxk-HYJ:www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/71959.php+gay+men+blood+donation&cd=8&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Anyone who’s used intravenous drugs or been paid for sex also is permanently barred from donating blood.


49 posted on 03/04/2010 12:22:38 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

LOL - The local blood bank had an urgent need for blood. My wife and I both worked for the local daily newspaper at the time and were glad to help. My wife has cerebral palsy and walks with crutches. The line got to her and the brilliant ‘blood tech’ decided on the spot that she shouldn’t be able to give blood because she might ‘infect’ others. When we informed them just how ignorant this was they seemed to be in a state of dumbfounded disbelief. They not only missed out on her blood donation but mine as well. Fools. Never again.


50 posted on 03/04/2010 12:24:13 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I don’t want fag blood even if 100% disease free.


51 posted on 03/04/2010 12:24:26 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

How about Jon being the first recipient of the tainted blood?


52 posted on 03/04/2010 12:24:40 PM PST by Dewey Revoltnow (Worst. Community. Organizer. Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

>> “Not a single piece of scientific evidence supports the ban,” Kerry said.

Worse than being anti-science.


53 posted on 03/04/2010 12:24:43 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
The American Red Cross, America's Blood Centers and AABB all support repealing the ban, saying the law is “medically and scientifically unwarranted.” The American Medical Association also supports modifying the ban.

Sounds good to me. Unless someone has credible evidence that the Red Cross, et al., do not...?

54 posted on 03/04/2010 12:24:54 PM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoCards

What’s wrong with this guy’s brain ?


55 posted on 03/04/2010 12:28:36 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Hepatitis is big in the gay community.


56 posted on 03/04/2010 12:29:21 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Oh, and global warming is settled science


57 posted on 03/04/2010 12:29:38 PM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Yep.


58 posted on 03/04/2010 12:30:21 PM PST by married21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
gay men account for 1/2 of all the new HIV cases, each year.

When 2% of the population has 50% of the AIDS cases,that tells me all I need to know about that "lifestyle" deathstyle.

59 posted on 03/04/2010 12:30:46 PM PST by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Let Gay Men give blood to Kerry.


60 posted on 03/04/2010 12:30:58 PM PST by ThePatriotsFlag (http://www.thepatriotsflag.com - The Patriot's Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson