Then out of one side of her keyboard she says that the Bible is the Word of God, equivocating out of the other side that it's not the Word of God if someone disagrees with what it says. And she brags about posting on the religion forum???
She later goes on to say that the Constitution is the highest law of the land, except, of course, when somebody ignores it, violates it, and doesn't like what it says. Then, according to her, it's not the highest law of the land anymore.
Her posts are replete with equivocations, obfuscations, pretentions, prefabrications, falsifications and are a mile wide and the depth and smell of that stuff I spread on the lawn every spring.
She wants us to believe that Fukino's contrived prefabrication is actually true and then pretends that she really believes that state laws requiring submission of this contrived prefabrication would get rid of Obama. Does she really think that people out here are unable to see through her prevaricating contradictions???
Well, as I said, I'm not into the "grand conspiracy theories"... Besides it's super ironic, that the very State (of Hawaii) and the very department which make the certified copies of the birth certificate (that people want to see) is the same one that states officially and to the public -- that Obama was born in Hawaii.
So, if we want to go into these "grand conspiracies" that the State of Hawaii is lying to you... did it ever occur to you that since they've got all the "information" for where Obama is born, that they have the ability to print out "whatever" certified copy they want to -- in order to show that Obama was born in Hawaii ... LOL ...
Of course, as I said, I don't go for those grand conspiracies, but that goes to show you how stupid that kind of "thinking" is... given that you're talking about the same State (of Hawaii) and same department of the state that makes those "certified copies"... :-)
Then out of one side of her keyboard she says that the Bible is the Word of God, equivocating out of the other side that it's not the Word of God if someone disagrees with what it says. And she brags about posting on the religion forum???
Well, if you have been on those religion threads, you would already know that there are those who say that the Bible is the Word of God -- while at the same time -- disagreeing with others (who say the same thing) on key words, phrases, sentences and paragraphs.
It happens all the time... and since you don't know that... it shows you haven't been on those threads... doncha know...
And no, that does not change the fact that the Bible is the Word of God -- what it shows is that people don't agree with one another as to what some parts of it means. That's what these disagreements show.
As I said earlier, I find it quite humorous, that those who post here on these "Bible issues" -- I simply don't see posting in these threads where I see discussions about the Bible and the Rapture and Jesus' second coming and the Tribulation and the coming one-world government that the Messiah of Israel is setting up -- and the Kingdom that will rule over all the nations of the world and the rule over the same people whom are alive today...
It's interesting to see that we've got these self-acknowledged Bible scholars who post on "other threads" (not having to do with the Bible) and never post on these particular "Religion threads" (as I mentioned for those topics above)... LOL ...
She later goes on to say that the Constitution is the highest law of the land, except, of course, when somebody ignores it, violates it, and doesn't like what it says. Then, according to her, it's not the highest law of the land anymore.
I think you're having some sort of comprehension problem here... :-)
You'll notice that I said that it is the highest law of the land (many times actually) -- but that does not stop people from having disputes over the meaning of many things in the Constitution (just like what happens with the Bible, as I was saying before).
And thus, if you want to "settle the disputes" -- then the Supreme Court is the last word on that, in the court system. Their word and decision puts an end to any legal disputes.
Furthermore if citizens don't agree with the Supreme Court decision, then they have the ability to undo that and make a Constitutional Amendment which will undo whatever some Supreme Court decision says, and then "that" will be the final word.
That's our system... and if you don't like it ... well, I really can't do too much about that. :-)
Her posts are replete with equivocations, obfuscations, pretentions, prefabrications, falsifications and are a mile wide and the depth and smell of that stuff I spread on the lawn every spring.
Just "saying so" doesn't make it so... doncha know.
Anyone who can read and comprehend these things that I've just said, knows from their own understanding that it's all very true and that's exactly the way things works in the "real world" that we all live in.
If you don't like "reality" -- then stringing together a long list of "adjectives" complaining about it -- won't do a thing to change it... LOL ...