Since you believe and want us to believe that Fukino was correct in her prefabricated opinion that Obama is a “natural born citizen”, issued in violation of state law, then you can’t honestly expect us to believe any more of your prevaricating prattle about loopholes.
Since you believe and want us to believe that Fukino was correct in her prefabricated opinion that Obama is a “natural born citizen”, issued in violation of state law, then you can’t honestly expect us to believe any more of your prevaricating prattle about loopholes.
Well..., I don't go along with some people's conspiracy theories that the State of Hawaii, their lawyers and the department that handles and preserves that birth certificate information (the same one that prints out the certified copy, doncha know... LOL...) -- is going to issue a public and official statement to the nation and tell them a lie... :-)
Sorry, that's off on the deep end of conspiracy theories...
But, then again, and as I said before, getting that state law passed which requires all candidates to produce their birth certificate or else they cannot get on the ballot -- will solve that problem of what the birth certificate says... which (as I said before) is a good enough reason for getting that law -- just to solve this particular issue of not seeing the birth certificate... :-)
So, I would advise getting to work on that law in your particular state. There are several states working on it right now.
But, in regards to "loopholes" -- that goes almost without saying... except that no one I've seen actually says it (so I say it...).
It's obvious that there is no legal requirement for a candidate to produce his birth certificate -- or else -- those various states who are going to pass laws on it, wouldn't bother doing it. They already recognize that there is no legal requirement to produce a birth certificate -- and so... they intend to get that law passed. That much should be obvious.
States and legislators don't bother passing laws that happen to be "already on the books". And so, since there is no law on the books that requires a candidate to produce a birth certificate... they're getting that legislation pushed through.
And secondly, it's also obvious from another angle that there is no legal requirement for a candidate to produce their birth certificate -- or else -- someone would have cited that law, in a court case, and a judge would have ordered it shown, per that law (but no such law exists, doncha know... :-), hence no judge will order it, without such a law).
So, on those two counts -- (1) states are working on such a law right now, and (2) if such a law existed, someone would have cited that law and it would have been ordered [and no one has cited such a law to date] -- it shows that there exists that "loophole" that I'm talking about -- in that no candidate has ever been legally required to show his birth certificate, because there is no legal requirement to show a candidate's birth certificate.