Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Not Nominate the Next Reagan in 2012?
American Thinker ^ | Feb. 27, 2010 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 03/04/2010 8:32:42 AM PST by pkajj

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2010 8:32:43 AM PST by pkajj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pkajj

And Fred is a BIG BUDDY of McPain’s.


2 posted on 03/04/2010 8:34:16 AM PST by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

Ugghhh. I cannot believe I forgot about Fred Thompson. I have dutifully changed my tagline.


3 posted on 03/04/2010 8:36:22 AM PST by MattinNJ (Thompson/Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj
Fred is TOO OLD, TOO TIRED and...... TOO BORING!!!!!
4 posted on 03/04/2010 8:36:56 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, Guts and Guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj
MICHAEL REAGAN: “Sarah Palin is my Dad in a skirt”. Destroys
any argument to the contrary... who loved him better... who lived with him and was reared by him? Who would know best?

LLS

5 posted on 03/04/2010 8:37:33 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

A lot of us love Fred, and for good reason. But didn’t we learn from his half-a$$ed campaign in 2008 that he doesn’t really want the job? It’s not like we can drag him in kicking and screaming.


6 posted on 03/04/2010 8:37:40 AM PST by Ace of Spades (Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

I think we need a woman ... Sarah is the one. One thing you can tell about Sarah, if she doesn’t know, she will appoint someone who does.


7 posted on 03/04/2010 8:38:24 AM PST by Tarpon ( ...Rude crude socialist Obama depends on ignorance to force his will on people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: ZULU

Would Jeri run the WH like she does his radio show? I’m a proud Fredhead, so I fair in asking this.


9 posted on 03/04/2010 8:38:59 AM PST by Sybeck1 (November can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

Ok so to be President according to this article you need to be:
Old
From a small town
Been either in movies and/or tv
and
Male

Is that right?
I mean I love Fred, but dang...


10 posted on 03/04/2010 8:39:11 AM PST by ozark hilljilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

Not sure about Thompson, but agree that these are exactly the characteristics needed in the next GOP presidential candidate. Anything less just isn’t enough.


11 posted on 03/04/2010 8:39:42 AM PST by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

If, as the article claims, the conservatives will control congress after 2010, and past 2012, what potential negatives would there be to a fully-conservative government? We now have ample evidence that a fully-liberal government is incapable of truly leading the country, and acts solely in its own self-interest. Truly conservative policies tend to be long on pragmatism, and somewhat shorter on humanitarian (for lack of a better term) elements. Would the mass elimination of wasteful government departments, cutting of entitlements, and dramatic reduction in safe-havens for unions have any backlash or negative consequences? I have to assume that there would be some, at least.


12 posted on 03/04/2010 8:40:10 AM PST by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

I sent Fred a campaign contribution last time around, and he dropped out of the race just days later. Once shame on you, twice, shame on me. No thanks.


13 posted on 03/04/2010 8:40:45 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

I luv Fred, but if he didn’t want it bad enough in 2008 to campaign has hard as he could, what makes you think he would want it enough in 2012. Plus, he’s getting old, and still has health issues.


14 posted on 03/04/2010 8:40:50 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

I supported Fred in 2008, but he doesn’t have the fire to be Prez, nor the energy any longer.


15 posted on 03/04/2010 8:40:56 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

“Conservative republicans will control congress after 2012 elections??” Yeah. We thought that was the case in 1994 too! And didn’t WE get surprised!!


16 posted on 03/04/2010 8:41:27 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

BULL!!!!!


17 posted on 03/04/2010 8:41:46 AM PST by AKA Elena (St Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle -- and this is war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ace of Spades

Well said. That dog won’t hunt.


18 posted on 03/04/2010 8:41:53 AM PST by Obadiah (Democrats and their life partners, the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

Fred had a fantastic opportunity and blew it.


19 posted on 03/04/2010 8:43:59 AM PST by montyspython ("I don't believe in 'no win' scenarios." - James T. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pkajj
I was a strong supporter of Fred in 2008 and he bagged it, right before the Florida primary. Left us scrambling to choose the lesser of several weasels. He should have stayed, collected the conservative vote, and played power broker. Instead he left the field.

Consider how he launched his candidacy in the first place. Nope, Fred did not have the necessary fire then and I have little confidence he'd have it this time.

Fred would be a great Dick Cheney for Sarah, not necessarily as Veep but certainly as mentor and senior advisor.

That said, an epic disaster that made it clear that a senior statesman had to be POTUS, then it's #1 Cheney, #2 Fred.

20 posted on 03/04/2010 8:45:05 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("Shut it down" Rush Limbaugh, 3/3/10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson