Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius Valerius
There is no choice. The statutory minimum is $750 per violation. There were 37 violations. Thus, the damage award is $27,750.

Of course there's a choice. If you believe the statutory penalty is disproportionate for the crime, you might reason "Well, I know she did the crime, but the penalty is disproportionate and I have no way to modify it but to find in her favor. Maybe next time the labels pay to have a law passed they'll put in a more reasonable penalty. Then I might uphold it."

31 posted on 03/04/2010 8:37:22 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking
"Well, I know she did the crime, but the penalty is disproportionate and I have no way to modify it but to find in her favor. Maybe next time the labels pay to have a law passed they'll put in a more reasonable penalty. Then I might uphold it."

Yes, I'm sure that when the now-existing Copyright Act was passed in 1976, the record labels were salivating at the opportunity to nail people who didn't pay 99 cents to download .mp3s.

69 posted on 03/04/2010 10:46:02 AM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson