[Hawthorn]

>> speculative trading, which serves no productive purpose <<

This sort of worthless verbiage looks exactly like what we've learned to expect from the likes of Harper's, The Nation, Mother Jones and The Worker.

Therefore it's truly disappointing that the otherwise respectable Forbes magazine would allow such leftwing nonsense to get thru the editorial process.

[Graybeard58]

As a long time subscriber to Forbes print edition, I gotta wonder if Forbes is smoking him some wacky weed to allow this crap in his magazine.