Do you think he might be told not to lecture the court on the law?
Your Honor, if this court doesn't know what those words in the Second Amendment mean, might I respectfully suggest that yes, you DO need to be lectured on the law, as it seems that you have no grasp or understanding of it. And I say that with all the due respect your comment deserves.
But we all have to realize that the "oral arguments" are just bread and circuses for the masses and have little or no bearing on the merits, decision or opinions in the case. They're purely for show. Which is why this would be an ideal time/place to point out my point.