[grellis]

This is basically the government stealing money from business owners and giving it to the union.

From the article:

Along with the money that is paid directly to you from these clients, you receive a check each month from the state to pay some of their expenses.

If the business owner wouldn't lay down with the dog, the business owner wouldn't get fleas.

[GeronL]

The thing is, why is the government forcing them to pay money to the union? Is the union a part of the government now?

[CharacterCounts]

If the business owner wouldn't lay down with the dog, the business owner wouldn't get fleas.

So, every seven-eleven and other grocery store which accepts food stamps should be unionize? These people are not lying with dogs - they are merely accepting clientele from individuals who receive government benefits. Without too much stretch of logic, this type of "unionization" could apply to nearly every small business in America.

The government has created a two class system. Essentially, they are installing a system that gives a leg up to "unionized" child care providers.

This has to be a violation of the equal protection clause of the Constitution.