Interesting you are both a Grant and Bush fan.
I’m not “trashing Grant”. I never said anything negative about his military service.
I just said he was a lousy President and gave a few suggestions for a better choice.
I don’t know of ANYONE who would defend Grant’s performance as President, except maybe a Bushbot or two.
ZULU, you haven’t kept up on my posts here on FR, but I’ve gotten into a few exchanges with people who love Bush more than I. I was let down like many were let down and after initially signing up on this site in 2001 I had inquired about a new screen name, but never got a response back or a new name. But love how you try to turn it around in your disrespect of Grant and saying he deserves no such honors. I just pointed out that Grant WAS MORE THAN A PRESIDENT as you well know and you want to sweep the true reason he was given the honor away and not address his pivotal role in the saving and rebirth of the Republic as General in the Civil War. You are all shameful to push this when there are other honors to be given to Reagan, but at the cost of Grant you people have no respect for a remarkable man who I’m sure Reagan would be appalled at the disrespect.