Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hypo

the founding fathers defined Natural born citizens in the congressional records as CHILDREN OF CITIZENS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NATURAL BORN
the Supreme Court defined Natural Born Citizens as CHILDREN WHOSE PARENTS ARE U.S. CITIZENS there is no question to the meaning of Natural Born Citizens( both parents U.S. citizens) The progressives want it “reclarified” so that they can change it.


86 posted on 03/05/2010 2:32:56 PM PST by omegadawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: omegadawn

I was referring to the argument that it is not defined in the Constitution, I’m well aware of the definition can be found in other locations.

Dems/Libs like to interpret, so you have to nail down an exact definition when you get the opportunity. These resolutions would be a great time to do that. Make it a State definition, for election purposes, and let the SCOTUS fight it later. At least it would get the argument out in the open for debate.


87 posted on 03/05/2010 2:40:11 PM PST by Hypo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson