Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan
Okay, we'll disagree on the rhetoric level, I just don't see it being all that different. The difference was that W decided not to respond, not to defend himself, and that left a void in public discourse. I found that disconcerting some time around 2005, and still do.

I think you are admitting he didn't: I would have been screaming in self-defense if I were President Bush, but that's not what he thought was the right thing to do.

67 posted on 03/03/2010 10:31:27 AM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark
Of course I'm saying he didn't respond hard enough to his critics. What I disagree on is what good it would have done.

I mean, how is one to respond to a play or book calling for your assassination? The rhetoric was far worse.

Oh.......and campaigning against Bush was only one reason McCain lost. Certainly not the only reason.

He was a horrible candidate. NO disagreement there.

69 posted on 03/03/2010 10:49:09 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson