I believe the rest of my post (which you chose to ignore) exemplifies my feelings about the man. Problem is, in a choice between Mitt and Obama, Mitt is nominally better. Hell, there are DEMOCRATS that would be better, so that isn’t saying much for Mitt.
“I believe the rest of my post (which you chose to ignore)”
I didn’t ignore it. I just didn’t have any issues with it. I think perhaps you have mistaken my intent.
“in a choice between Mitt and Obama, Mitt is nominally better.”
Yes, but my point is that we must no longer allow the GOP to saddle us with nominees who are only nominally better than a depraved scoundrel like BamBam.
It is my assertion that they will not start acting right until they are faced with utter destruction. We must reduce them to that choice: Good nominees, or utter destruction of the party.
In every organization you have people who belong to the organization, and people who think the organization belongs to them. If we can’t take the organization away from those people, then the organization must die.
No matter what, the pubbies must not be allowed to continue along as before.
If it gets to that point, it won’t work any more than it did with McCain. If the base is holding its nose to vote, the independents look over and say, “If his own party doesn’t want him, why should I?” Furthermore, if the base isn’t excited, they don’t man the phones or pound the pavement, and if there’s a cloud in the sky, they say, “Well, he can squeak by without me.” Enough of them do, anyway.