BTW, you wouldn’t classify the use of the pejorative (and incorrect) term “Paultard” as snarky? You *do* like double standards . . . SHOCK . . . just like a Dumocrat!
Perry really is your man.
LOL - a little projection there, hmmmmm?
You Paul Cultists can't understand anything other than outright worship.
Listen, all politicians are humans and none of them are perfect. They all have flaws just like all of us do. The Palutards, for some reason, seem to hold their little god and his disciples like Debra Medina on altars. I mean, there is a sick, worshipful passion with these Paul supporters that just boggles my mind.
And they're weird because they project that worship onto anyone else who supports any other candidate. Yet, most of us don't feel that way. You go find any post of mine where I've gushed about Perry. Or any politician, for that matter. You won't find any. I choose candidates based on whomever comes closest to my own ideology. I'm never going to agree with a candidate 100% and I sure don't worhip any of them.
And there's no rational discussion with people like you because of this. Your obsessive worship makes it impossible for you to understand that someone can disagree with you and still be intelligent.
You and that other Paulbot on here both posted snarky remarks to me first and now you're wetting your pants because I have responded to you in kind. That's another trait - Paul Cultists can dish it out (boy, oh BOY can they dish it out!), but they become nasty and insulting the minute they get some of their own back.
I know you politician-worshippy types always insist on having the last word, so you can have it. You have seriously become quite predictable and dull.
Peace out.