That's for an oath, not a high five. But I guess John Roberts is also part of the conspiracy...
Posted on 03/01/2010 3:51:30 AM PST by patlin
There are many in the press today caricaturing me as a "conspiracy theorist" simply because I, like millions of other Americans, insist on actually seeing proof of Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility.
I've never alleged a conspiracy. Obama was given a free pass by an opponent who had his own eligibility issues. Not much of a conspiracy necessary – especially with Obama accountable only to a fawning press and scared-of-their-shadows Republicans.
But "conspiracy theorist" is an easy epithet to hurl.
One good question to ask, the next time you hear someone call me that name, is this: "Who is Joseph Farah conspiring with?"
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Only the founders could be ‘just’ citizens. But Chester Arthur’s father was from the UK and that didn’t disqualify him.
Think about this: if England decided to make Sarah Palin a British citizen, would that disqualify her?
I can only imagine the dirt they have on Hillary and Bill...Ron Brown, Vince Foster etc.
it was verified by the Hawaiian health director.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Okay?...So?...When you have a heart attack get a judge to fix it.
( Sitting here laughing!)
Really? Aside from a few early on who were born pre-revolutionary war, and ascended to the presidency in the early 1800's who are they?
Obama's father was a foreign national, later his mother divorced him & married another foreign national and moved to Jakarta. Obama attended Occidental College in LA and it's almost certain he enrolled as a foreign student ... or, at least has gone to great lengths to expunge the records. Then, you have the the issue of Obama's multiple SS numbers, etc., etc..
I think all the legal burners should be kept on ""Med-HI"" under this set of issues, including the BC. But, BUT BUT, I think the main legal event should now be the battle for a Writ of Quo Warranto now circling the Federal District Court in DC. The non-title bout should be the fight to get the Hawaiians (Republican Gov and AG!!!!) to follow their own laws and release the documentation which led them to declare the POTUS an NBC.
I also think that these issues in the legal arena should be handled by competent, non-hysterical attorneys. NOT Russian Lady Dentists, whose pleadings read like "Wild and Crazy Guy" skits from SNL, NOT Obamanaut 5th Columnists like the aptly named Kreep, and not by crazies like Berg.
I also think that due to the complexities involved, it would be foolish to think that based on this set of eligibility issues alone that Obama will not make to 2012. Whatever any court anywhere rules, it will still come down to Congress voting for Impeachment in the House, and trial and conviction in the Senate. That just ain't gonna happen, at least over the eligibility issue.
We have a whole 'nother problem. There's a country in trouble; a ship headed for the rocks and nobody on the helm. Republican sweep to congressional power in 2010? O great. What, exactly are they planning to do with it. More McCain-Graham Bullshiite? Cross-aisle business as usual? I don't have a clue about the plan, because our boys don't have a plan. Obama has a plan. Keep everyone distracted with his ineligibility issues while he marxifies the country. In order to do that, he NEEDS the country on the rocks.
IMHLO, We cannot punish Obama for this fraud until after he leaves office in 2012. Win, lose, or draw, in the courts, he is the sitting POTUS and can only be turned out of office by Congress.
Proritize. Help the GOOD lawyers keep up the pressure on the eligibility issue with the goal of preventing this eligibility travesty from ever happening again. Let the rest of us keep up the pressure on the Republican Party to save the ship of state.
You might want to check history as they tried to disqualify him. Just before his death, he burned all of his papers.
Chester A. Arthur’s eligibility
IT WAS FIRST DISCOVERED ON DEC. 6, 2008 THAT PRESIDENT CHESTER ARTHUR - DUE TO HIS FATHER HAVING NOT NATURALIZED UNTIL 1843 - WAS BORN A BRITISH SUBJECT IN 1829 AND THAT HE ACTIVELY CONCEALED THIS FACT FROM HISTORY BY MULTIPLE LIES CONCERNING HIS FATHER'S EMIGRATION, AGE, AND RESIDENCE IN CANADA.
it does not appear that the United States has ever had a President who wasn't born in the United States to parents who were both United States citizens. There have been Presidents who had one parent born abroad, but as far as Applicant has been able to verify, in each of those cases, the alien parent had become a Citizen prior to giving birth to their child who later became President."
Why are you on Bam's side? Why are you arguing to prove he's legitimate? What proof do you have other than what he's told you? Has a court verified his Colb?
These posters vouch for Bam’s birth (for which there is no legal proof), then claim that they don’t support him. Clueless.
Obama was born in Hawaii.””
Name the hospital.
2007 signup eh........arguing to support the Usurper in Chief. Tell me what that looks like.......
I've been using the examlpe of bammies father being Putin or osama him self with the same circumstances, just different father.
Guess what, some here actually said he would still be elegible, I kid you not.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2460992/posts?page=73#66
“Why are you on Bam’s side? Why are you arguing to prove he’s legitimate?”
I’m not on obama’s side. Obama wants everyone to be distracted from his policies. It’s like the Clinton years when people accused him of every crime in Arkansas and couldn’t find anything.
Prove that Constitutionalists don't know what his policies are. That's a stupid argument.
I like that one too.
How about the OBL, obama defense league?
“2007 signup eh........arguing to support the Usurper in Chief. Tell me what that looks like....... “
Now you really need to get out your tin foil hat.
it does not appear that the United States has ever had a President who wasn't born in the United States to parents who were both United States citizens. There have been Presidents who had one parent born abroad, but as far as Applicant has been able to verify, in each of those cases, the alien parent had become a Citizen prior to giving birth to their child who later became President."
“If there had been some way to disqualify him, I gotta believe the klinton Schutzstaffel would have done it. Unless the party kapos and the chicago mafia stopped them...”
And you’d be dead wrong with your assumption. Do you not think the Clintons are owned just like Oboy is owned? Quit thinking like the power level stops with those running for an office. The power is well above the office of presidency. You should know this by now huh?
Oboy, the Clintons and a whole brood of them do exactly as they are told. Wake up. These fools are not competing - they all say ‘Yes sir’ to the same brood of evil global money.
Note - don’t assume the ‘killings’ referenced are initiated by the would be presidents either. Expand your thought process.
That is one aspect of this that I am not clear on.
I recall a Senate Resolution that stated children of Military who were born overseas were NBC, then later it was changed to all citizens, again, as long as both parents were citizens.
For example, if you and your wife were on vacation out of the country and she gave birth, or what if the birth occurred on an air plane in the middle of the Atlantic, or anywhere outside of US air space.
Like I said, I'm not clear on this aspect of it.
Do you know any sources I could go to to clear it up?
As a matter of fact, as attested to by the very photo you posted — yes, Chief Justice Roberts is a part of conspiracy to defraud. He did not do his duty. Sad. We should all hope for more integrity from the Chief Justice. A sign of the times, really. It is similar to the clown act of Chief Justice Rhenquist at the horrific sham of an impeachment trial of President Clinton. One aspect of that bench rot of the highest bench: http://www.slate.com/id/1005611/
And it doesn’t matter how many times Obama is sworn in, he is unable to hold the officer legitimately because he does not meet the Natural Born Citizen requirement.
Bam's divided loyalties are because of who he is and what he isn't.
He isn't an American. In Germany, when he campaigned, he stated that he's a "citizen of the world". Why do you think he said that? Would an American say that? Would you?!
He bows to heads of state and apologizes for American exceptionalism. BECAUSE OF WHO HE IS! He has no allegiance to America.
Raised in Indonesia, family in Kenya......And you claim he fits Constitutional eligibilty requirements? Tell me, did the Founders risk EVERYTHING just to give it all to someone with divided loyalties?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.