I do not disagree with that. Cashill was right on target with “Dreams.” But even he says that his theory here is more of a hunch.
I would be inclined to believe that hunch for another reason.
In my own “hunch-analysis” of The Usurper (I will NOT speak or write its name) I have come to believe that he is consummately lazy. I believe that the reason that there are no writings from his college days, or law school is that they simply do not exist, or if they do, are blatantly plagiarized.
Either way, the influence from Davis was both perverse and formative. With the types of psychos from whence it sprang, it’s easy to see how this monster became what it is.
Mark 5:9, “My name is Legion, for we are many.”
Post 19
Another thing that has struck me about Obama, he has had the “wind at his back” for what little of his life we know about.
I don’t think his currently accepted parents would account for that. That means, at least to me, that a lot of people KNOW who his parents are and at least one isn’t as claimed.
My hunch-analysis agrees with yours. Basically, Obama is a B.S.'er from way back. Because of his literal pedigree, he has been fostered and coddled throughout his career. He does not like to get his hands dirty. He likes to go before the troops, offer some touch-feeely words and then go to lunch.
He has a team of enablers around him now. Yet, he will fail at leadership. When opposing factions within this group force Obama to make a tough decision - he will choose wrongly or weakly. And tomorrow, another tough decision will have to be made - he will choose wrongly or weakly.
We will see the coddled one fail in the area of strategic decision making; eg. Choosing gov-ment run health care over jobs creation.