Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/27/2010 5:05:15 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Steelfish

I think just about anyone will be able to beat Obama.


2 posted on 02/27/2010 5:06:22 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

The Republican Party and the GCM will nominate Mitt Romney. It’s his turn.


3 posted on 02/27/2010 5:11:16 PM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

From Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_Daniels

Daniels was part of the Reagan Administration when he became chief political advisor and liaison to President Ronald Reagan in August 1985.

He is a Presbyterian. Daniels is a grandson of Syrian immigrants and was honored by the Arab-American Institute for his work in the community.


4 posted on 02/27/2010 5:11:31 PM PST by sodpoodle (Despair - Man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I’ve seen this guy on C-Span. He’s a down to earth, smart, modest individual—everything Obama is not. Put up against him, Obama would look like the egomaniacal, preening phoney that he is. Daniels has gravitas. Republicans could win with him.


6 posted on 02/27/2010 5:16:18 PM PST by WestSylvanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

We’re in bad shape if the best that we can do is to nominate Mitch.


9 posted on 02/27/2010 5:23:56 PM PST by curmudgeonII (Vocatus atque non vocatus deus aderit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Mitch would be a great pick for Sec. of the Tres. in the Palin Adm.

Bean counters don’t make for great people for National elections One reason Mitt will never win.

Mitch would be a better team player in the cabinet


10 posted on 02/27/2010 5:24:37 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
Here's a video you may find interesting.
14 posted on 02/27/2010 5:35:06 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I have not really been paying much attention to the speculation over who will run in 2012, but he would be at the top of my list of consideration. A solid track record of successfully applying conservative principles, executive experience, a firm grasp of national issues, proven ability to attract voters beyond the conservative base; he seems like a candidate straight from central casting.


15 posted on 02/27/2010 5:35:45 PM PST by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
Heck daffy duck would be better than Obama, and if things continue the way they are daffy could beat Obama in the next election.
21 posted on 02/27/2010 5:49:09 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I haven’t had anyone tell me yet that this guy is a social conservative, what little I can uncover seems to indicate that he isn’t.

Some freepers have speculated that he would be useful for diluting Mitt Romney’s support in the primary.


22 posted on 02/27/2010 7:43:15 PM PST by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson