The disgust and outrage felt by those who realize what has been done is palpable throughout the country. Add this to the frustration of having the fraud accepted and certified, and now officially ignored, leaves us with very limited recourse.
As the sitting President, the de facto, if not the de jure President, Obama sits at the head of the Executive Branch of Government. He is therefore immune to civil and criminal prosecution penalties while there. He, usurper, criminal, fraud, or not, can now only be removed by Congress.
They can take the ruling of the appropriate courts (The Federal District Court in DC, and the SCOTUS) under advisement ... OR NOT.
The fact that he currently holds the position of POTUS illegally, does not give him legal status....
He is ineligible on the face of it, i.e., based on the facts we know. But he has not been ruled ineligible. In fact, 50 states AGs have certified him as eligible, i.e., they accepted his and his party's affirmation. He was certified by the President of the Electoral College, and sworn in by the Chief Justice. There can be no doubt, fraud or not, that he is the sitting President of the US. If he's a fraud, he can be Impeached (Charged) by Congress in the House, and convicted in the Senate. Congress needs no court's permission to do that.
If a Writ of Quo Warranto is properly obtained, and that court or SCOTUS on appeal, finds him ineligible, after appeals are exhausted, Congress may ... or may not ... choose to remove him. That's their call. Again, if they chose to remove him, they could try and convict him or find him ineligible, without the court's involvement.
"Have him arrested ... jailed... etc. etc. " cannot be done. Congress, and only Congress, can have him removed from office. Once removed, he would of course be subject to the law of the land, as any other person.
Team Obama, with knowledge aforethought, found an area in the Constitution that has not been properly protected, or at least not adequately tested, and driven a truck through it.
The only court constitutionally open for redress of this by the citizens is the Federal District in DC. First, the AG has to be given the opportunity to bring the people's case. If he refuses, as he would be expected to do, since he is the President's lawyer, another lawyer may ... or may not..be allowed to. It is also expected that the AG .... and the Federal District Court ... both highly partisan ... would use delaying tactics.
IMHO, this is the severest test the Constitution has been put to in two and half centuries. In all probability, the Founders never imagined that an ineligible Presidential candidate would ever be a very serious problem ... since at that time, apparently everyone knew very well what a Natural Born Citizen was!
It just sets my teeth on edge.
At this time, as your no doubt aware, quo warranto action has been filed by two attorneys, Orly Taits, and Leo Donofrio. Taitz has given the AG the requisite time to respond, and he has failed to do so.
As for the states (50) that having accepted beforehand, based on accrediation by the AG and the DNC, were duped. Many have started proceedings against those states, to investigate and invalidate states approval and electoral college votes for said candidate, based on fraud at the highest levels of the DNC party.
Another tack is being tried right now. That being to take away the financial backing of national lawyers from Soetoro/Obama as the fraud was committed before he became president. Hence, he must supply and pay for his own legal defense as an individual.
Of course, the 900 pound gorilla in the middle of the room is the fact that he simply does not comply with the nations voters request that he prove he is a natural born citizen.
So much for transparency, eh?