Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid
As far as why didn't they define the term then...that is a question for those around at the time. I would assume because the general public at large were unaware there were questions surrounding C.A. eligibility. Therefore, there was no need at the time.

Maybe there were no questions because Arthur's status as a Natural Born Citizen was accepted as fact due to his birth on US soil and his mother's citizenship.

142 posted on 02/25/2010 7:39:29 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: lucysmom
"As far as why didn't they define the term then...that is a question for those around at the time. I would assume because the general public at large were unaware there were questions surrounding C.A. eligibility. Therefore, there was no need at the time.

Maybe there were no questions because Arthur's status as a Natural Born Citizen was accepted as fact due to his birth on US soil and his mother's citizenship.

--------------------------

Maybe that's what they thought. Maybe there was no indication that his father was a foreign national. Who knows. You'd have to ask the folks around then what they thought...or what they didn't think because of what they didn't know.

156 posted on 02/26/2010 9:17:20 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson